Skip to main content
  • Helping you with HIPAA Security Solutions.
  • Call Us (631) 403-6687
  • Office HrsMon - Fri: 9.00am to 5:00pm

Coding

Debridement In The Post Operative Period
Coding

Debridement In The Post Operative Period

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

“The patient initially had a gastroc recession at the right lower extremity. Our surgeon performed a debridement procedure of the right foot ulceration. It was performed in the clinic, and we planned to code it as CPT 11042. However, the patient is in the 90-day post op period from the initial surgery that was performed 4 weeks ago. Is a modifier necessary to submit for payment? Is it 79?”
Read More
DME Coding L3010
Coding

DME Coding L3010

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

“Medicare DMERC B jurisdiction has stopped abruptly allowing and paying for L3010 using RT KX and LT KX. I cannot find any information of new modifiers or other info needed. Any suggestions?"
Read More
Removing Hardware In Clinic
Coding

Removing Hardware In Clinic

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

“I have an unusual situation that I am trying to figure out how to code. I had a patient return to the office in the global period after I preformed a 1st metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis. Although, the alignment of the fusion looks good, one of the non-locking screws advanced out of the bone and plate and started to tent the skin at the incision site at three weeks post operative. She is neuropathic and denied any trauma to the area. I removed the screw in the office with local anesthesia. Can I bill for unplanned screw removal in the office?”
Read More
Metatarsal Fractures And MUE
Coding

Metatarsal Fractures And MUE

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

“I have a patient who suffered a Lisfranc injury that resulted in nondisplaced fractures of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd metatarsal bases. There was no disruption of the alignment of the midfoot. We decided that conservative treatment was the most appropriate option for the patient and this injury. She was casted using fiberglass. I am planning to code this treatment as CPT 28470 Closed treatment of metatarsal fracture; without manipulation, each. I was using the APMA Coding Resource Center and noticed that there is “MUE 2″ for this code. Does this affect how many metatarsal fractures that I can bill for during this treatment?”
Read More
Emergency Room Coding
Coding

Emergency Room Coding

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

“My group takes “call” at our local hospital, and this necessitates seeing patients in the emergency room (ER) on occasion. We are not all in agreement regarding what E/M codes should be used in this scenario. We have come up with different encounters: 1. A patient seen in the ER. The patient is then discharged to follow up for outpatient care. 2. A patient is seen in the ER and then admitted for continued medical treatment. 3. A patient is seen in the ER and is taken straight to the operating room for surgical treatment. What E/M code series would you recommend using for these different scenarios? Thank you for the help!”
Read More
Revision Surgery
Coding

Revision Surgery

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

“Do you have any advice on coding for a return to the operating room within the 90-day postoperative global period for revision of the prior procedures that were performed? The patient had a 1st metatarsocuneiform joint (MTCJ) fusion and 2nd toe, proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) fusion for a hammertoe. Post op x-rays demonstrated excellent fixation and alignment. The patient returned 2 weeks later and had obvious abnormal clinical changes to position of the fusions. X-rays showed loss of position correction at the 1st MTCJ fusion and the 2nd toe fusion as the two-component implant had disengaged and dislocated. The patient didn’t recall any injury. This required a return to the OR for revision of the fusion of both joints done three weeks post operative. The 1st MTCJ plate and screws were removed, the joint realigned and a new plate/screw construct applied. The 2nd toe PIPJ was opened, and the two-component implant re-engaged for alignment correction. Is the following coding scenario 28740 -78, CPT 28285 -78 correct to bill?”
Read More
Routine Foot Care in Nursing Homes
Coding

Routine Foot Care in Nursing Homes

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

Do I need to have a referral to provide Routine Foot Care to a patient in a Nursing Home?
Read More
Certificate of Medical Necessity
Coding

Certificate of Medical Necessity

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

“As I understand, Medicare no longer requires a Certificate of Medical Necessity (CMN) for Routine Foot Care. Can you please provide me with the actual announcement from Medicare that states that it’s no longer required and the date that it became effective?”
Read More
Coding Percutaneous Work At The Metatarsophalangeal Joint
Coding

Coding Percutaneous Work At The Metatarsophalangeal Joint

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

“What is the proper CPT code for percutaneous capsulotomy and tenotomy of metatarsophalangeal joint?”
Read More
Routine Foot Care: A Lot of the Same
Coding

Routine Foot Care: A Lot of the Same

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

“I am a young physician and the practice that I am currently at codes almost all routine foot care patients as the following: 1. Tinea ungium B35.1, 2. Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) I73.9, 3. Pain in left toe. Documentation is all the same: “All nails are thickened, discolored, and painful with subungual debris” with CPT 11721. Basically, there is no individual nail documentation and all nails are always painful with PVD. This includes younger, disabled patients who present with some thickened nails. I was under the impression that you have to document individual nails and that pain alone is a qualifying diagnosis for nails, if used as the secondary code. My question is: wouldn’t coding only CPT 11721, with pain and PVD to all toes all the time raise red flags?”
Read More