Medicare

“I am in practice and would like to figure out a different way to contain and manage my routine foot care. It is approximately 15% of my practice. I would like to designate one morning a week as a routine foot care clinic. I am considering making this a cash only clinic: $50 for toenails and $50 for calluses. Is this possible? I am a Medicare provider and have contracts with most insurance companies. I was hoping to model my cash clinic on what some nurses in the area have done. They visit a nursing home and offer residents $25 for routine foot care and do not work with any insurance companies or Medicare. Any thoughts on this cash model, routine foot care clinic would be appreciated.”

“I’m trying to determine the coverage of diabetic shoes for a patient who has had one foot/leg amputated. Somewhere in my brain I seem to remember that Medicare will cover a pair of shoes so the amputee can wear the shoe on his prosthetic. Does this also apply to heat moldable inserts? Can we dispense them for the shoe that will be used on the prosthetic leg? I would appreciate any thoughts on this situation. I have read the LCD and associated article but can’t seem to fully understand how this works.”

“I just received a letter from Cigna insurance. As of August 13, 2022, they will require the submission of office notes with claims submitted with Evaluation and Management/E and M codes (ie. 99212, CPT 99213, CPT 99214) appended by modifier -25 when a minor procedure is also billed the same day by the same physician. The E/M will be denied if documentation is not received. The claim can be sent electronically with attachment indicator and notes should be faxed. Is this happening with other insurance companies? The amount of paperwork for a small office is crazy and along with continued decreasing reimbursements, higher prices for supplies, shortages, etc. The insurance companies are making greater profits than ever. The insurance premiums have increased and out-of-pocket patient billing has become more significant. The system is not right. What can we do? How do we fight back? Please don’t say take cash rather than insurance, it’s not practical in many circumstances. Any thoughts?”

“For Medicare, it has been well established that debridement for callouses is not covered when class findings are not present. But what about that patient that complains of pain from a callus. If you evaluate the painful callus and manage the painful callus, would it not be appropriate to bill a low level E/M code? This patient does not want surgery but this is a recurring problem. Can the E/M be billed each time the patient is seen?”

“In the summer of 2021, when the delta variant was near its peak, I attempted a house call visit to review laboratory results and discuss treatment options. The family of the elderly patient did not want anyone in the house and recommended leaving the results and instructions at the front door. Lab results, my interpretation of the results, prescription and instructions were left at the front door as instructed. This, of course, required driving to the patient’s residence to accomplish this. How could this scenario be billed to Medicare?”

“A Medicare patient is admitted to the hospital for a foot infection and suspected osteomyelitis of the left, fourth toe. Amputation of the toe is done at the metatarsophalangeal level and billed CPT 28820-T3. However, post-operative x-rays reveal that there is residual bone, presumably from the base of the proximal phalanx that remains. The patient is taken back to surgery a few days later for removal of the residual bone. This was done during the same hospitalization. Would this be coded as CPT 28124-78? Would the -78 modifier not apply since there is no global for the amputation? Could CPT 28124 be billed without a modifier?”

“I received notice I am being selected for a TPE (targeted probe & education) review by Novitas Medicare. I practice in New Jersey. I have gone over the LCDs and the “educational” materials they sent. My documentation seems to be aligned with what they want. Any advice for working with them to have this resolved as soon as possible? Any things to avoid? Should I have someone other than myself act as a liaison between Medicare and me?”

“Is there a foolproof way to deal with the “Medicare doesn’t cover orthotics” issue? Is there an article that explains to the irate patient on the difference between functional orthotics and diabetic insoles and what is covered by Medicare? In this scenario, we typically explain to the patient that orthotics for plantar fasciitis are not covered. We have them sign an ABN and we can easily send the L3000 into Medicare with the GY modifier. We can share this with the patient and they can see that it is not covered. However, what can we do when the patient calls Medicare themselves and are told that orthotics are covered?”

“We had a patient that was dispensed an ankle foot orthoses (AFO) about 4 1/2 years ago. This device broke and he was having difficulty walking without it. We dispensed a new AFO and it was denied as the original wasn’t 5 years old. We had a very long telephone conversation with Medicare along with the patient and his attorney. Unfortunately, Medicare wouldn’t budge as they said he should have gone back to the provider of the original brace, even though it was in another state. We did have an ABN, but the patient said that he’s not going to pay for the replacement. We are working with him now to at least get our lab costs. Unfortunately, appeals don’t always work. We requested a peer-to-peer, but after several months we have not heard anything as they are too backlogged! I suspect that there are other stories like this out there. I wish we could just tell patients what it costs and they hand over their credit cards.”

“On all of our patients that qualify for routine foot care with the diagnosis of I70.203 Atherosclerosis we send an “Atherosclerosis Letter” to the patient’s treating doctor with our findings and ask them to sign if they agree with our findings. 99% of the time the doctors send the letter back signed. We have always done this in accordance with the routine foot care LCD that in the past stated that we had that letter or documentation from the treating physician in our patient’s chart “in a timely manner.” Recently we have had some doctors sending back the letter, disagreeing with our findings. We have already billed the services from their initial visit knowing or thinking that we will have that documentation for the next appointment in 9 weeks. This led me to research the LCD again, and I am unable to locate the verbiage that was used before about the patient’s other treating doctors agreeing and signing anything. It merely states that we have our findings in the note and the other doctor’s name on the claim to Medicare. Do we need that letter agreed to and signed from the patient’s other doctor? Do other offices also send this “letter” to get that info? Any input is greatly appreciated.”