CPT

"An in-patient consultation was done and later on the same day an in-patient surgical procedure was performed. Medicare has paid for the consultation code but has denied payment for the procedure stating that “a CPT or a CPT/modifier combo is not compatible with another procedure or CPT/modifier combo provided on the same day according to the CCI.” The codes used were CPT 99222 and CPT 28820 (T6). Any suggestions?”

“I have great difficulty getting paid for CPT 28308 when a hammer toe repair is performed at the same time. The billing scenario generally will look like this: CPT 28308 (2nd metatarsal osteotomy) -RT CPT 28285 (2nd hammertoe repair) -T1 -59 We never get paid for CPT 28308 in this scenario. Does anyone have any suggestions? We link the acquired deformity of bone diagnosis to CPT 28308.”

“We have had more than one claim where Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oklahoma is paying for CPT 28122 but denying CPT 28306, despite the use of the 59 modifier. Our question is why wouldn’t CPT 28306 be allowed instead of CPT 28122 as it is far more work? We are trying to determine how to appeal this.”

“We are inquiring about the use of the Q7 modifier when billing nail and callus debridement with Medicare. We are aware of the changes to the LCD with diagnosis codes. When billing nail debridement CPT 11721 and callus debridement CPT 11056, we are submitting diagnosis codes Z89.412 and Z89.422, (acquired absence of toe) with a Q7 modifier to show “non-traumatic amputation of a foot or an integral skeletal part of the foot.” Now we are being told by Medicare that per the LCD, we cannot bill those diagnosis codes even with a Q7 modifier. Should we be billing with a different modifier?”

“I am curious when and how to bill G0127 or G0247 instead of CPT code 11721 when performing Routine Foot Care.”

“I recently saw a new patient with Oxford insurance for a tinea problem. A prescription was given and options for additional treatments were discussed. We billed his insurance for an initial office visit. The visit was allowed by insurance and the payment was applied to his deductible. He was billed by us. He checked with Oxford and is now telling us that “preventive” care is not subject to the deductible and would like me to resubmit to Oxford telling them that the visit was for “preventive” care. My opinion is that “preventive” care does not really apply to a specialist and that I could not undo what I already submitted. Can we bill for “preventive” care and, if so, is it possible to resubmit the claim?”

“I often provide wound care for hospice patients and append the GW modifier. However, I recently read that it would be hard to defend this as the wound(s) and wound process is likely related to the patient being deconditioned and malnourished due to their hospice qualifying condition. I am looking for clarification regarding this, should I stop performing wound care services to hospice patients?”

“Here’s the scenario: patient has a chronic ulcer left foot that comes in for regular debridements/wound care. Two weeks ago he has a full thickness ulcer and osteomyelitis at the 2nd toe right foot and I performed a partial amputation of the toe in the office. He comes in for postop check five days later and everything is fine. At his 2nd postoperative visit, I notice a new punctate ulcer plantar 2nd toe with exposed bone and progressing osteomyelitis. I did a prep and debrided the bone at this visit (Yes, authorization was submitted for a more proximal amputation at a future appointment.) I also debrided the wound on his left foot. The question I have is with a multiple modifier order/rule for the debridedment of the ulcer left foot. I billed the visit out as follows: CPT 11044-78,T6 CPT 11042-59,79,LT Should the order of the modifiers with the CPT 11042 be -59,79 or -79,59 (or does this matter?) I have seen coding recommendations that say that the 1st modifier should be the “pricing” modifier and the 2nd modifier should be the “procedure” modifier but I am not sure of this.”

“I am trying to get a handle on the 2021 E/M changes. The question I have is about the defining pathology/diagnosis as “acute” versus “chronic.” This is critical in the portion of the medical decision making. What do the guidelines tell us about these definitions?”

“In the past, it has been postulated that a doctor had the option of using a fracture code or using E/M codes to bill for fracture care. With the upcoming changes to E/M reimbursement, it would seem that billing using E/M codes might make for sense for fracture care. Are there any thoughts on these changes upcoming for 2021?”