Skip to main content
  • Helping you with HIPAA Security Solutions.
  • Call Us (631) 403-6687
  • Office HrsMon - Fri: 9.00am to 5:00pm

Medical Coding

Revision Surgery
Coding

Revision Surgery

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

“Do you have any advice on coding for a return to the operating room within the 90-day postoperative global period for revision of the prior procedures that were performed? The patient had a 1st metatarsocuneiform joint (MTCJ) fusion and 2nd toe, proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) fusion for a hammertoe. Post op x-rays demonstrated excellent fixation and alignment. The patient returned 2 weeks later and had obvious abnormal clinical changes to position of the fusions. X-rays showed loss of position correction at the 1st MTCJ fusion and the 2nd toe fusion as the two-component implant had disengaged and dislocated. The patient didn’t recall any injury. This required a return to the OR for revision of the fusion of both joints done three weeks post operative. The 1st MTCJ plate and screws were removed, the joint realigned and a new plate/screw construct applied. The 2nd toe PIPJ was opened, and the two-component implant re-engaged for alignment correction. Is the following coding scenario 28740 -78, CPT 28285 -78 correct to bill?”
Read More
Routine Foot Care in Nursing Homes
Coding

Routine Foot Care in Nursing Homes

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

Do I need to have a referral to provide Routine Foot Care to a patient in a Nursing Home?
Read More
Coding Percutaneous Work At The Metatarsophalangeal Joint
Coding

Coding Percutaneous Work At The Metatarsophalangeal Joint

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

“What is the proper CPT code for percutaneous capsulotomy and tenotomy of metatarsophalangeal joint?”
Read More
Routine Foot Care: A Lot of the Same
Coding

Routine Foot Care: A Lot of the Same

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

“I am a young physician and the practice that I am currently at codes almost all routine foot care patients as the following: 1. Tinea ungium B35.1, 2. Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) I73.9, 3. Pain in left toe. Documentation is all the same: “All nails are thickened, discolored, and painful with subungual debris” with CPT 11721. Basically, there is no individual nail documentation and all nails are always painful with PVD. This includes younger, disabled patients who present with some thickened nails. I was under the impression that you have to document individual nails and that pain alone is a qualifying diagnosis for nails, if used as the secondary code. My question is: wouldn’t coding only CPT 11721, with pain and PVD to all toes all the time raise red flags?”
Read More
Hospital Consultations
Coding

Hospital Consultations

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

“After watching some E/M presentations, it was suggested that hospital consultations should be billed with CPT 99252-CPT 99255. When we billed these codes, our EMR system and our clearing house rejected the codes. They are saying effective 1/1/2010, CMS has announced that they will reject these codes. Are we billing the right codes?”
Read More
Tibial Sesamoid Pathology
Coding

Tibial Sesamoid Pathology

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

“How do you code for a fracture of the tibial sesamoid? Is it any different if you considered it to be a symptomatic, bipartite tibial sesamoid? What about an avascular necrosis of the tibial sesamoid?”
Read More
Billing For an E/M
Coding

Billing For an E/M

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

“I am not sure when I should and can bill for an E/M when seeing patients for wound care. Is it reasonable to bill an E/M code if the patient returns for follow up for their ulcer and it is 100% healed? Occasionally hyperkeratotic tissue is present and sometimes I debride the callus to confirm the ulcer has healed. I always spend time on these visits educating the patient on ulcers and the diabetic foot. Would it be appropriate to code for an E/M at this visit since the vast majority of the time is spent counseling the patient prior to discharging them from care?”
Read More
Simple Versus Complicated
Coding

Simple Versus Complicated

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

“What constitutes the difference between CPT 10120 and CPT 10121 – simple subcutaneous versus complicated subcutaneous foreign body removal? Take for example a patient is seen in the clinic with a splinter that I was unable to retrieve simply. Instead, it required local anesthesia and deep probing but no incision or suturing. I removed a 2 centimeter wood splinter. It was subcutaneous, it was “more complicated” than a typical splinter to retrieve (needing local and more than usual probing) yet really wasn’t THAT complicated. How do you define complicated in this case? RVU values for CPT 10121 versus CPT 10120 seem to indicate there are very real differences between the two codes.”
Read More
New Consult on a Post Operative Patient
Coding

New Consult on a Post Operative Patient

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

“How do you code for a hospital consultation when the patient is in the postoperative global period from another surgeon? I was called to the local hospital to see a patient that was transferred for medical treatment for an unrelated condition. He had a transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) performed for apparent osteomyelitis at the other hospital by a different podiatric surgeon. I was consulted to evaluate the TMA site and make recommendations for management. How do I code the diagnosis and E/M for this post-operative consultation?”
Read More
Routine Foot Care and Heel Pain
Coding

Routine Foot Care and Heel Pain

by Michael Warshaw, DPM, CPC

“I saw an established patient who returned to the office for “At Risk,” Routine Foot Care. The patient also had a new complaint of heel pain. I obtained X-rays of the foot and gave a steroid injection into the heel. Can I bill for the “At Risk,” Routine Foot Care and those additional treatments as well?”
Read More