News

“How would you code this? I’m stumped. Operation 1. Attention was directed to the medial aspect of left great toe where an incision was made overlying the interphalangeal joint. The incision measured about 3-4 cm in length, the incision was deepened via sharp and blunt dissection, careful attention paid to all neurovascular structures appropriately retracted as necessary. The incision was carried down to bone, the soft tissue was freed from the medial side of the bone at the IPJ. The long flexor tendon was reflected plantarly. The accessory bone was found on the left and seemed to be adherent to the phalanx. It was removed and sent to pathology. The wound was flushed. C-arm radiograph taken pre and post to be sure that the bone had been removed. It was. The flexor tendon was reapproximated and maintained using 2-0 Vicryl, skin closure with 2-0 Vicryl. 4-0 Prolene. Operation 2. Same, right foot Operation 3. Attention was directed to the ulcer of the left great toe, 2 converging semielliptical incisions made surrounding the ulcer, excised and sent to pathology. There was necrotic tissue and debris within it. This was sent as well. The wound was flushed and closure performed using 2-0 Vicryl, 4-0 Prolene. Operation 4. Same, right great toe The doctor coded it as follows: CPT 28315-50, CPT 11422-TA, CPT 11422-T5.”

The most recent breach was reported by QRS Healthcare Solutions who has the EHR product Paradigm. What does this mean and what can you learn to protect your practice?

FDA Recalls October 27 - November 9

“I have a patient who suffered an inversion, ankle injury. This injury resulted in a severe sprain of the lateral ankle ligaments and a fracture of the fifth metatarsal. The initial treatment involved immobilization using a CAM boot. I billed an E/M code and CPT 28470 at the initial visit. Eight weeks later the patient is in clinic, the 5th metatarsal fracture has healed clinically and radiographically. However, the ankle ligaments are clinically symptomatic and the patient is complaining of continued ankle instability. This clinic visit was focused on continued treatment of the lateral ankle ligaments and we are considering an MRI for further evaluation. I know I am still in the global period for CPT 28470, but I am still working on this ankle! Can we bill an E/M for this visit?”

“My practice involves a lot of routine foot care and I am looking for clarification. In using Q8 and Q9 modifiers, do you need to have atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease (ASPVD) as a diagnosis? If so what’s the code to be used for general ASPVD? Modifier Q7 indicates that there has been an amputation. It is not necessary to have an ASPVD diagnosis in that scenario?”

FDA Recalls October 19-26